- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy5 G2 g' \+ P( X! ~
Penile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
' A; T- w& p0 ~, Qmale newborns: epidemiology and influence of+ G" _, P4 T' B/ z8 i" P
endocrine disruptors. V, X! Y1 ^) X5 l4 `
Abstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal1 e2 A, w. |9 \+ a4 @* C2 ?
stretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-' t* V# C) K$ x% N6 S' n
tal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
. {% T( [5 F r* [+ f. fare influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-; R; u: Z0 d% }( g* A
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were
- _. i" O$ W% R5 l+ U. Tincluded; their mothers were subjected to the following
- P% I; j5 U7 j% vquestionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-
. P ~, S+ b. Vtact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure" t6 u% \. s% ]* A' I
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital7 t5 j) b w7 @0 c
anomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro k7 Y2 c# Z/ }& V/ l2 [ H; F X
fertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured# c( n* E0 D" f; e6 R( {% W! x
in 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length
0 t& k$ D7 P" J L" _was 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered, ^4 g# z0 u1 [9 j+ K4 W7 S. d
micropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %
4 h! [. ]* Z2 n9 \' S) q: g(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-
9 g$ ` ?: a5 W9 m& G# o: Ylies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )7 s9 s5 Y# G( E$ b# J0 q
than in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,0 f: y9 w/ Q9 f
95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed, o; r( z" z, h4 r6 @& A4 U
a linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower# O* Q# I6 f' I o
in neonates exposed to EDs.0 r% T' u4 C* G& @) g+ C. i9 n
Keywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;1 p7 | e$ o. E9 b
penile length; testosterone.
! W# k$ {# o6 D! P- X*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of" g# I) X! K. {8 o
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36
3 I; O7 s% v- d$ N! u: T" @Hisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo8 h, n7 u" u& j% ?/ a
11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,0 T7 k+ w: I( b
E-mail: [email protected]
* X8 d) w; c1 L7 _5 q& S6 dMohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of8 b2 w" f& U' \ s5 d
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,( O$ _" F5 W/ I4 a: N/ a; `" p
Egypt
9 r H' d5 V& T# T6 | {" ~3 ?Introduction
7 u+ I7 K$ F$ L& J- p+ {6 nDetermination of penile size is employed clinically in
: Z, x$ y% Y+ D( s3 e) [9 {the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
, A+ ~8 s; X! C9 B6 h4 Z) Vopment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a! A: b5 X' M! J
penis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is [9 k. ^5 w9 j( c4 E
more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean
% G, X: d. m @% C$ ?' n$ h) s/ \size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements5 r/ h, m) F h& }7 D/ ]1 y7 D4 y
can be subject to significant international variations, in
1 n8 E: E. E! k& h& Yaddition to being obtained with different methodologies
( L1 h. G' V! Q' `( }in some cases (2) .+ X# H& O- @3 L- K( E
Over the past 20 years, the documented increase in
; T& x; b4 _/ b1 V# ^; Cdisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
! h( z: ^" v0 D& lspadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the5 c2 r1 |# w+ V& d# e
suspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental+ D6 a$ s7 u, X+ E( o; [
to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-
1 O1 d' X4 m, x n' n/ n& `- `called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible+ l. o- H6 V6 w3 c* ^1 w: d
common cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-8 q" I+ O& E; ]* X
malities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to
3 B; `6 g8 t! V1 j/ x( V* eoestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
' o* K8 @% s# q7 _6 nof fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated
2 o- K) C) ~3 L" a6 s: {" G8 @3 c. Mdevelopmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality
0 l: p" c7 I! R. R" Pof semen (4) .- G' B7 J) o1 {( ?& Y# U
It has been proposed that these disorders are part of
; z; [7 F w4 e4 fa single common underlying entity known as the testicu-( M% k* K/ s4 L/ h% V
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various
1 ~+ p% W$ E$ `* g9 F4 haspects of impaired gonadal development and function,
& I" u8 a4 T5 M; ~& q9 n7 uincluding abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism, X1 L: S9 L. K) T6 B( n$ c
hypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .( I. @7 h/ W4 Q' N
The etiological basis for this condition is complex
+ s c0 u/ F1 D" {/ _! e* Q# nand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
: D* b" C' @5 g; [and environmental factors that result in the disruption
# E X- H- K& ~ }5 X% @of normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,( J, N8 U! q+ O; h1 l
it was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-
" P. H# z* `2 _6 I4 G0 _" ctrogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male% m) P; a% T2 `# {+ H
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to
4 ], `) X# L5 R+ u$ k* Zinclude environmental chemicals with anti-androgen0 z2 {$ d* E f! P3 d2 w
actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between5 E& |$ t. L( O
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by, `) ^( T4 w) O8 X8 ?1 w S+ o9 c
which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
; d, |) h7 W3 Eresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive
! I# t2 @- t; h3 T. Stract abnormalities (5) .
- L0 r: B7 O) p& c7 YWith the increasing use of environmental chemicals,
4 e. ^2 [& V! @# z4 S- E. z6 Man attempt was made to establish the normal stretched0 }% p2 e5 z' k) ^1 O
penile length as well as the prevalence of male genital
2 c5 K% q. g- R' y7 Y& [anomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an
; r2 i0 u7 O/ a4 P9 K' kinfluence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs
@4 o: c3 x' ?/ T* i: `on these parameters.
2 c0 c/ l- i" \* @% o2 B$ rBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco& o+ x: F& P8 d; B. j$ R) o
Authenticated
+ X3 S' P; M. [# U& `* f, [Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
% ^7 |- i- R& E) {- O1 v7 b510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
8 Y+ y; T5 B; u' d- C0 Z- [3 _2 xSubjects and methods
) ^. N( t7 A+ a' `( T) Y( k. pStudy population( d6 d" [/ U* r6 E, ]& A
The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-; f8 ^# F6 c- L
sity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000
: C$ U1 n; v: H2 I' f; ~male full-term newborns was studied.! Q8 `! T4 ` e/ c
Sampling technique
& N# Z |0 [- W9 u& L5 D9 E& k9 G+ tThree days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each/ `" {. r% V4 k8 f% u
day, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
" e: e! d) Q; x9 A/ Wstudy (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007., R) C+ m$ e+ \: G \
Statistical analysis
7 O6 v9 q' i1 Q- ]! qThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,+ B9 N/ d- o7 T% R$ g" Z
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
- K( h5 L1 r8 y* `. X! A9 b5 rvariables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-% H( r- f2 x* U* X" e: l% J
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for: s& Z; p2 [# ~/ F
normally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
5 A! F2 L8 S$ v8 j( X2 Mdone using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-) _; j) M! |# ~1 S: w/ E8 C$ }
tributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of6 j$ h: u& W; ] V; g& L
qualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test
0 W( t. q0 y9 u1 v$ h$ d3 c! kwas performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-5 J5 o3 @0 g* \
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a
( \& Q' i* K" r, ~probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .
' ]2 T) q: D, H9 V- X5 ?Results5 d" F7 M* ]( }. V
Data collected& O* \* ]9 T: \ S, R& b
A researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
2 Y2 W7 P5 Q4 [" d* X5 K4 Cviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information! ?; s: j9 y) M2 t1 _" ?6 M
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
0 F( @$ {/ u! G$ S8 aparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
' ~8 |9 ^: y% n7 k2 y0 hfrequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during
" l8 p _3 ]- F! D% apregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history
8 R& K2 q4 C8 Y! Nof hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-- B3 g9 X+ o, l3 S) J
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,1 ^0 K+ l1 H. R0 K2 e! d: w0 y
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-& D+ q8 Z8 q: s# e5 e# S
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs2 P6 s) d" C2 H2 T; D1 ?& V
given).* g, S1 s6 o% e1 M: S
Environmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-& i' x5 F! X$ }& M& [' v
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed5 y& a: H! W. o9 D! C- T) a
into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having
& c: y+ F8 V+ C8 g- S7 E6 _$ G6 Yendocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-
- j1 n# k% S% @6 e" N6 wruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of, Y3 x3 {+ I* D; C
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .
3 k, G1 h8 k8 @; v _Descriptive data9 y* K4 }" {& z* M; P
The mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
. [1 | u" w7 @1 i1 ~20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range2 I2 K9 k- z% r: g i( @
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-/ l H) W A7 J0 Z1 ? C+ c
nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-# @2 O/ ^; r: v4 m, M7 K( Q, H
ing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers$ T3 Q& M: m2 c0 m
(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,
5 W: @; e5 Q, e! {8 b7 b$ [6 |- T% S+ L6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-
G1 S* t( p- p8 P; d: b. Tacting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )
. Q2 H! L! V, d, t% b+ Y% breceived B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
0 d+ \9 p) I4 p1 V+ nwhile the rest did not receive any medications during4 F( E+ O9 _8 D6 Y
pregnancy except for the known multivitamins and
8 W1 b/ A+ g4 D% K3 L( e9 m: q2 Vcalcium supplementations. In addition, family history9 w" {! K6 |4 F( O+ M9 S( y( ~
of newborns born small for gestational age was positive
$ c0 g! N7 ]: `' F/ ~# _$ Y# ~; lin 21 cases (2.1 % ).; E" z" t& M% {6 a" A4 [) _
Examination( S. k& P6 I C |/ t0 F1 d1 ^* j
In addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy Y$ S7 r- Q; A& O& h
was examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the
0 \4 c2 @4 c; y% _) w8 U7 bfi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination$ S- z% R3 c* n# w& t# d+ B* l4 i- ]
of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
- U4 B# i6 k X$ C0 alength (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital+ o& l6 z& G* ]3 _( W4 Z
anomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-) W1 N7 A8 N Z. z5 X4 [6 L8 A& P
dias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-2 j5 C6 \5 A( u; E
tal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-, q0 @0 P- Q V! c
lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included3 \. L9 \# Q# [1 j# q( ~& a
as cases.
) b8 T+ M; ?* bPenile length4 l) y' k* K$ `4 r# Z( L
Laboratory investigations
. g/ D; Q @- B5 y; l2 xFree testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-
; r; m4 J6 N1 F7 K- g; B7 `( W6 pnates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-
4 p7 Q+ U9 y/ |$ f; p8 _8 omunoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,
6 c5 y) D% d+ v7 jDorchester, Ontario, Canada).+ Y. R6 n* F4 r' h u) F
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm)." t' @# x6 U" z6 ]6 l
A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the0 d \; p- I/ ?: U- G2 K& y
mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to, Q' y9 x1 l5 A% G' o$ V- x
have micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)/ o0 }) _. I+ B5 u$ V) a8 q
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the/ G* h" Y1 u B6 a; Z, M
non-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).
, W9 ]2 I2 L. D- IThere was a linear relationship between penile length
: `; R2 S7 D7 `$ z- ~and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-, q, L, W7 T) Y# F7 i3 Y# P3 h
ficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there/ }( q, W+ w5 `# B# R* ?2 [
was an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length
7 {8 ]" c4 v$ f! b( ](cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between; a. Y: o! ]; N5 G
penile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-# f, B$ b8 z5 b! K, m7 X' {$ Y2 R
sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,
6 W9 t8 v) D+ Jthere was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in
8 H2 P- M; F3 T1 j, f, v5 Wweight (kg).
" o5 D" u( q; T, I& RBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
/ m( W( ?5 f& ^7 m: iAuthenticated
2 `- F/ u4 z U+ i7 S% qDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM/ Q; w4 B+ o7 J; c: r7 @0 R
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511
; O7 j$ A; U# X1 Z% s/ [. o: O% R8 a3.45
& Z$ J0 b6 A, s7 p0 }4 x+ U; T2 r3.40
+ L9 C& ]4 w/ Q3.35
! \$ F% m' R3 T3.30
$ ]. M0 W) F/ C3.25
, T" l5 M8 d0 L+ N( S3.20
7 h* T9 p* j+ c. R+ B: U3.15: u, j. o6 s0 l* \
3.10& D( E" `6 y# X; y( |8 f& \, I4 J
3.053 q2 q2 X j2 ^% s* w% ~
3.00, V6 H. e! y' L; g/ w1 F4 K
2.95$ E& m, ~3 Y; N
2.90: L$ E- N( y4 ]- y7 D& L0 n9 E
Mean
: I5 A/ r+ ~$ i W6 l% _' v+ Openile' {/ `3 [( g" k
length6 p* ?$ w+ H& w! Y2 x5 s$ M# E! f
an odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons$ M5 i2 E s1 C/ ^
were six times more likely to develop anomalies than
8 K. E9 a* e$ ~8 G! I: E |those not exposed (Table 1 ).
u: `7 |3 Z) M! y6 {' ^Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring
7 e( M5 R# [& R. w! ?* ~+ x* aof those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),
8 p- V; j( V1 s! _/ Fphthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In
, n3 Z- X Z$ a4 x0 C, gcontrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had
/ E% O7 w- `0 x6 I3 ggenital anomalies (Table 2 ).
' ]0 X$ T4 b- _Exposed
% L0 Y* h3 M+ o" t; lNon exposed
# }& T$ m. z4 q4 i9 q. q$ mPenile lengths according to exposure to endocrine J! Q* k+ J$ u3 C7 Z7 M# [
Figure 1 disruptors.; T3 v* q1 A7 h2 i+ {4 e/ z
Serum free testosterone levels1 V3 e4 ^' p" g4 l
Exposure to cigarette smoke and progestins' s: l+ p% K& A }) a; v
during the first trimester0 M, Z' x6 O; B
None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;
* {6 O( i+ B: b/ P350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There
) \% }* w4 [0 L: xwas no difference between rates of anomalies among L, O1 o! J$ E/ D0 \% w
those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those L# L9 f3 S% c4 u; F1 S5 G
not exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-) E }1 V4 j: v% ?
ence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed
, v( U7 R3 F# g8 R/ ito progestins during the first trimester when compared to
5 n; l1 x# s+ U- J1 f: Jthe non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).
. m" z) A" O6 [; @7 O! y; j& p& ~In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels* I {, j0 V5 ?" x9 @* O/ d# ?- @6 o
ranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL; N- E A, H7 i8 e2 |8 w
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship: F- X5 n' u" ^
between penile length and testosterone level of the
+ O2 b' j; Y9 _; F8 L s1 L5 Qnewborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI" q# X2 R$ @" E3 L, e; s
0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm1 \. h9 t0 ^4 Y: k Z
in penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone1 b+ h. t$ l+ @0 O3 f- t% U5 |: g
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly
9 z- n; v# n0 |! glower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
8 n6 K1 v# K3 a7 X, z$ q) H* P- {than in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;
8 E' F3 `; r# O! {* s& ]p < 0.01).
1 z3 q7 g, L5 [4 }; D; CTable 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of
$ T$ u/ D6 g5 Z# Wexposure to endocrine disruptors.
# b: C$ i0 U+ h9 z; wExposure to endocrine
" N0 N7 V, h% S' l, v3 gdisruptors
* [3 Q0 u; M0 Q0 s) ?) |' c. NPrevalence of genital anomalies
" a( `% o& j$ N% U2 ~/ e4 m, HAnomalies Total; n+ |6 ^* n- F* q' o
Negative Positive3 I7 G9 T2 [1 w7 g4 m3 N
Negative exposure 908 11 919
. S! k9 x( U+ w0 d& W4 b% F98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %- _3 o8 J% J, x. j: ^" w
Positive exposure 75 6 812 |+ X* A$ F' }' X
92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %& }5 v! U; G* [8 X. h/ D
Total 983 17 1000+ {7 b& @( B$ B* F f+ P1 X
98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %
. \; p* K. [( g' e: ~# Eχ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.' P, g, n. w# r& N7 M z
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
2 e6 c7 d7 w" H! S+ {# Zanomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
+ \0 Y3 a" g+ U" c3 L Yaccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu- ?" I& H4 @# a, w
lar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One
7 u1 t) i$ F4 Qhad penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-2 l* E T& ?! D7 T( j) v
sided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.
: q9 r! a/ [: ^; h* rExposure to EDCs3 S% r. `6 ?2 ^" w+ q+ J
Among the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were
+ V' O Y+ S4 G& N# hexposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from
. Z$ x3 B- c) _& c1 O2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from
" Y8 R2 V& E9 ^8 @, o" |weekly to 2 – 3 months per year." t; H; {7 F* O" G8 X
There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies
. \" h9 w6 T; {. h- Z/ eamong those who were exposed to EDs when compared
2 {8 K1 h; d; qto non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with
1 r& `% J% {" I- z- _Table 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in7 k+ M: j* f5 |
the group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).
2 W$ `/ R" A1 h; A" h- l$ v9 y9 {Anomalies Total- ~- Z" O2 [- G2 \* I
Negative Positive/ u0 {; P5 B! x! K, M2 k
Chlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21
) O5 z9 N) ~# C6 n( @8 W' ?* ~90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %
/ w) L5 I, q* xHeavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
4 G/ \1 Y! h+ A+ ~' O5 f93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %
* _3 m ]: B- ]4 HPhthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23
$ {4 G: ~4 ]( l i9 r91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %
/ J7 p% U" P8 _8 S" k: V7 NPhenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5# b6 x1 f8 W1 i1 j' l/ r. }' {
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %
5 v" Q# a& T1 g; G# y0 ZTotal 75 6 81
0 j. [4 R7 ~6 P9 z5 _/ B/ r9 O92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %( y; i! b- |1 U4 J" c
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
/ O3 U, ?5 y; k1 ~" GAuthenticated( w; x' ]$ j3 m# A7 X/ ]3 a" `( d
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM) w# g/ S) u8 g C+ _9 X
512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
+ V; `" G G! K. eDiscussion
0 a$ F0 a7 t9 S1 c5 tPreviously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm
% O b9 K% Q1 j: k2 \(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ,
, ^: V6 c( m6 z7 i8 Q* [6 A4 ^; ?7 Dmean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly0 L8 j3 y: r$ p3 W
higher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower$ ^$ m; B) V. ?! Y3 M
limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in1 T9 g, K. N2 K6 a' s
our cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-& W# b7 i) X7 M! h% s1 M
ing the normal values for each country because the normal
5 c3 y7 a8 j1 W5 H/ }4 K7 hrange could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,% j9 h3 |3 p: W" h
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of
: Q; [4 S6 f- z4 dmicropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,
+ R, W) Q$ S8 s* s& |. JEast-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).6 w1 t% h' I' ^9 n0 y! O+ }5 g
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
' f& V' X* _5 w% t, `a penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest
5 P" Z9 U) z/ F! [1 y5 slimit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition. ^, ~8 l, s7 s F# _, G" c: |
of micropenis is important, because it might be the only
$ o% t# R8 u0 v9 }, V! ^obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-0 g1 u3 [! o! H# c* T
monal deficiencies (17) .7 W% C2 [8 t' g4 U" U( L
The timing for measurement of testosterone in new-8 }4 Q! W4 f% B ?/ G) {
borns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
9 v. X# Q) ` j7 bweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level; F9 T( V4 g: E; m
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a, Y* `) @. t, ^& k
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to4 h( k! n* Y9 V% u
make sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
h7 `) X+ z. n8 q- i7 o' qwere discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a
% B. J/ B0 c0 ?linear relationship between penile length and testosterone6 R$ g+ c2 f, X
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-
) n& p7 \: u$ hnates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,; F! k- m; Y( B* d' f: S
which could be related to the lower testosterone levels in9 T! q# a$ k. x: @
the exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis
) H2 L6 g" k) [! q5 V. esyndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or
% A: N% y: b4 cenvironmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies
& H6 M! Y+ t% K* E% R& Thave found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-% r- K R7 U* ^
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .4 m) N% ]! \9 u7 }( k
Some reports have suggested an increase in hypo-
8 l$ _9 _# D1 nspadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European M6 [) t9 n. e, d# J/ Y" }
and US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical
7 V; n$ i4 G7 N/ d" [$ j. x, ldifferences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from8 r. |6 b* \# s* I
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations
9 E" |/ q. Z0 \0 N" `& Ahave been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-$ S+ w- D5 o' S' M# r& U/ a9 D* f" ~
graphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
( O( ^9 T% n' z6 s7 {0 B+ p' rcritically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,
7 J8 f) o7 B4 sincreased exposure to environmental factors affecting
' p2 ?) _: [" X) @4 m \7 @androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with
" @5 [. c8 C# Q1 ]% Westrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause1 I& A# {/ w# U/ ]* p
hypospadias (3, 4) .
& R6 y5 z7 C( ?In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-8 Z4 D e; V1 P, e0 ]
spadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.
( [, B' t0 S8 `( k2 n. u7 O- JWhen applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average
s" a' v& y* }7 ^' ?prevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per
1 H1 Y& A# @6 k& q& s" P10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased
, j& L; @8 c9 I& T2 t* Csignificantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The4 u- Y ~( w1 t
prevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
: [" ~9 e! l+ N2 H; X& xat 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the
0 p: o7 e( S( B: {7 H! F3 z3 \prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
( L4 j" y4 @5 L4 `2 }$ ~; CWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns
- E0 i2 W% R7 D# E. V7 }9 Lexposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
$ \/ W7 o+ ~ _& \/ M) S" v1 Z(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental- k% P+ Y3 q7 Z
pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.
' j! K% v$ V* f' @$ I& f% SWithin the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
( _. Y4 O" J, y7 Z4 j" w: W# qhave suggested environmental factors as a possible cause
% [7 E1 n! u; p& r m' Ufor the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in7 H; }/ R: R5 I4 t9 t4 Q
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/
6 i( S5 W/ l; n) ^8 xoccupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy/ ]2 {2 u) E7 ^* p3 v5 j
indicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for
) p( {) _: c. C+ L2 Gthe development of male external genital malformation& A- T$ ]6 J# {1 k1 F4 r! j9 D
(27 – 29) .
$ m# U' e( A" y EReceived October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
c: F5 Y Z/ k. B7 jpublished online March 18, 2013
# o. ?1 V5 j' @. |* s9 VReferences: u; B" h2 I6 R7 G0 Z0 [* P
1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J
+ v0 p2 S2 L) ~- fUrol 1994;152:4 – 14." r9 s, j/ h! G
2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
. P1 e' |+ ^* Z( w# @pometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
' u# d' a! o9 _. E* g; \2007;83:441 – 6.3 ~/ ^( M: m3 q# z2 E* e0 J- {6 E& E
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al." b0 x+ P8 u: V; J( l5 E6 Q# u
Environmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of
: S, Z$ t8 I- ~: l4 `/ _male sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:7 {3 G6 ` f9 ]. t6 E9 z1 k( W* k
99 – 105.
. Q* X* Y l. d- {1 b8 J! |4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling6 f" Y) T& S2 b
sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?
+ U5 p# \! d4 b1 S; }Lancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.
9 u; J1 z$ K+ d5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new
, h& `. \9 z6 E8 @and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:
7 V L4 l/ P) D9 D633 – 41.
% _+ v, A X) r' ]6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.
/ O$ j. d" R) w3 TTesticular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic8 _: d; S# p6 H6 o% M7 @
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.8 U7 B2 b3 J) h! @" z
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a
, `: E2 u$ B* b0 E7 P q, wcompilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,
1 I7 h# g+ l+ K$ ^# o1 `UK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on
2 W! }1 c2 U* M3 l; ]1 i' {! \March 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.) P. g0 w7 {: e: u
8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary2 `$ z ]+ T, o; N3 } F4 T/ I9 [' N u
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.
5 i5 ~2 p1 u4 ^; `4 hBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
/ ^3 _, N. u$ o" |Authenticated
# [4 c8 `- ]5 V3 b& T; F+ L: @Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM: B9 Z x, Y/ U2 n. P
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513
' k6 c8 p- E9 B8 [% N# ?8 b21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.
f$ j' ~' A: a5 d0 RA joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.
5 P3 _7 @, r M1 x) MActa Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.
8 T# f# v, d. P/ s2 `22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two- @3 B0 H% ]6 y+ M/ _, ]
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
2 E/ L7 Z) t+ c; |7 f; ^penile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.; h( |. E; m1 K8 S4 n( m8 [' a. y
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.4 E. l/ P/ ^( V+ [) U
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.
1 p4 j& {, w i. cGenital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J
3 T3 o4 {3 ^8 {% D- m9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at* d$ u) H3 P6 S! D0 h+ r6 w
birth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
! H7 @9 S% X: R' o0 r6 [3 R* S10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health1 a+ L* J6 d5 `5 e- h& \9 N
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.( y# [* G- l2 h9 N& V
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:
{% \) d6 W0 C0 Q# Rpenile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.
# M5 n1 W- f/ z6 j' g, v12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring
- w3 U8 N/ A; \) S13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term
0 h* H! V x. \- U0 \) z' Y5 a- @newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.
3 {* _$ W$ G1 b0 ]9 j14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore." t* \. V y( `, c
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.
6 K& d' p0 l" O' g16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.% ^, S' T* y1 r7 @* g
Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum+ r7 h. o7 l& m& ?- `. S! {7 X
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.& `; d! u% ]* t, x1 W
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.( c+ D5 h6 b$ f2 ?2 b
17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,; }5 `2 n5 Y! h5 @! t6 W7 Q
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study
& e& t+ u2 H+ V2 ~; C& sof 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology
9 Y7 K5 Q, |$ r6 h! ]# X2007;70:572 – 5.
6 G" Y7 q6 W$ x5 ^7 l18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular& _1 _- q* N6 D! F6 ?2 }: D
dysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.0 i# W5 L# X5 ]1 r8 K% c0 m$ f, y
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.
4 F( W% I! S8 X" ^+ J& i; V19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male6 J4 g3 V5 ~ O2 ^- }5 \+ W
external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.8 C! Z9 Q/ \* N
20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external$ i( z4 @9 g7 r2 d
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.
7 }8 V6 g9 F6 Z23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias
% h. F# j1 d- {' L% q( x* E6 eand cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:, U) k2 `) h! `) }
297 – 302.- d1 Y! {% y$ \2 `+ o7 L
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of/ n. O C4 e- M, v0 C
surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994. W9 y* I& I) c$ K! |' D; ?
Brussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis
: M( `* `# H. Y" p0 j& ?/ kPasteur, 1997.
. c. J" D7 X, a) J' o ]25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence; G! i6 H* B; Z- I" x
of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological
8 T- Q3 ?3 D( I1 a9 ^6 ]$ Glimitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update/ w& W% g% L n+ B" d
2001;7:282 – 6.; u+ H& I! y2 w
26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of/ F0 O# F' M) x/ {
hypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child
" b. N) V) e) {; _# u) v. c2007;92:580 – 4.
. X! a0 ]8 S; r$ Y: V. ^27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital
8 R0 v3 W" b f- Ydevelopment, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.$ L; v% O8 R, [" A
28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen: Z$ r$ U5 i: v5 z* @9 C4 _/ I9 p
C, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
& Y( J& d" e' j, c3 E- n; Z' dendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-
% j( R1 `7 y: c! l8 z4 K6 Pmations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
7 O/ o2 n; W8 `, eEnviron Health 2011;10:3.
. C" b3 B# w' `2 U29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High, T% @: x2 m* L
prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an
& ]) I, E0 h$ m5 u m* N7 lintensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl# y0 i' z! h6 c
2012;35:253 – 64. |
|